首页> 外文OA文献 >Prehospital identification of trauma patients with early acute coagulopathy and massive bleeding: results of a prospective non-interventional clinical trial evaluating the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS).
【2h】

Prehospital identification of trauma patients with early acute coagulopathy and massive bleeding: results of a prospective non-interventional clinical trial evaluating the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS).

机译:患有急性急性凝血病和大量出血的创伤患者的院前鉴定:一项前瞻性非干预性临床试验的结果,该试验评估了创伤性凝血病临床评分(TICCS)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Identifying patients who need damage control resuscitation (DCR) early after trauma is pivotal foradequate management of their critical condition. Several trauma-scoring systems have been developed toidentify such patients, but most of them are not simple enough to be used in prehospital settings in the earlypost-traumatic phase. The Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) is an easy-to-measure and strictlyclinical trauma score developed to meet this medical need.Methods: TICCS is a 3-item clinical score (range: 0 to 18) based on the assessment of general severity, bloodpressure and extent of body injury and calculated by paramedics on-site for patients with severe trauma. Thisnon-interventional prospective study was designed to assess the ability of TICCS to discern patients who needDCR. These patients were patients with early acute coagulopathy of trauma (EACT), haemorrhagic shock, massivetransfusion and surgical or endovascular haemostasis during hospitalization. Diagnosis of EACT was assessed byboth thromboelastometry and conventional coagulation tests.Results: During an 18-month period, 89 severe trauma patients admitted to the general emergency unit at ourhospital were enrolled in the study, but 7 were excluded for protocol violations. Of the 82 remaining patients, 8needed DCR and 74 did not. With receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, TICCS proved to be a powerfuldiscriminant test (area under the curve = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.0). A cutoff of 10 on the TICCS scale provided thebest balance between sensitivity (100%; 95% CI: 53.9 to 100) and specificity (95.9%; 95% CI: 88.2 to 99.2). The positivepredictive value was 72.7%, and the negative predictive value was 100.0%.Conclusion: TICCS can be easily and rapidly measured by paramedics at the trauma site. In this study of blunttrauma patients, TICCS was able to discriminate between patients with and without need for DCR. TICCS on-siteevaluation should allow initiation of optimal care immediately upon hospital admission of patients with severetrauma in need of DCR. However, a larger multicentre prospective study is needed for in-depth validation of TICCS.
机译:简介:在创伤后及早识别出需要进行损伤控制复苏(DCR)的患者,对于关键疾病的充分管理至关重要。已经开发了几种创伤评分系统来识别此类患者,但是其中大多数都不足够简单,无法在创伤后早期用于院前环境中。创伤引起的凝固性疾病临床评分(TICCS)是为满足此医学需要而开发的易于测量且严格的临床创伤评分方法:TICCS是基于一般评估的3项临床评分(范围:0至18)严重程度,血压和身体伤害程度,并由现场护理人员对严重创伤患者进行现场计算。这项非干预性前瞻性研究旨在评估TICCS识别需要DCR的患者的能力。这些患者是住院期间发生早期急性外伤性凝血病(EACT),失血性休克,大量输血以及手术或血管内止血的患者。结果:在18个月的时间内,共入院了89例入院急诊科的重度创伤患者,但有7例因违反协议而被排除在外。在剩下的82位患者中,有8位需要DCR,而74位则不需要。通过接收机工作特性曲线分析,TICCS被证明是一个有力的判别测试(曲线下面积= 0.98; 95%CI:0.92至1.0)。 TICCS量表的临界值10可以在敏感性(100%; 95%CI:53.9至100)和特异性(95.9%; 95%CI:88.2至99.2)之间达到最佳平衡。阳性预测值为72.7%,阴性预测值为100.0%。结论:护理人员可在创伤部位轻松,快速地测量TICCS。在这项针对钝伤患者的研究中,TICCS能够区分是否需要DCR的患者。 TICCS现场评估应允许需要DCR的严重创伤患者入院后立即开始最佳护理。但是,需要更大规模的多中心前瞻性研究来进一步验证TICCS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号